Things must be kept adjusted right, such as flywheel clutch, cross feed system, and knotter. ![]() I think the 276 was a better baler than the 320, although the 320 did have higher capacity. We used to make 65-70 lb hay bales with it. We used to have a 276 and it was a good baler. It's pretty easy to produce "banana" shaped bales with the older balers, particularly in varying conditions. The newer cross feeding systems are also better at making a nicer looking bale, particularly when the windrow size varies a lot. But, if the baler has been well maintained, they can still do a decent job, especially if you don't push it too hard. The newer balers (565, 575 ) and newer have a much more reliable cross feeding system, IMO. That was probably the weakest part of the older balers. When you're looking at it, pay particular attention to the cross feeding system. Used to work for a farmer that had a 276 baler. ![]() What can you tell me bout them and do they make at least a 40 lb bale or no? Thanks Only thing is that I don't know much about them balers so figured I would ask on here. They won't 2000 for it and looks to be in decent shape too. ![]() ![]() Was looking around on the Internet and ran across what seems like a good deal on a new holland 276 square baler.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |